Post by Admin on Jul 13, 2017 0:32:02 GMT
With traditional colleges and universities, of course their is pressure due to the academic schedule. And not everyone does well under this.
But their are also social issues. The more prestigious the school is, and the more it is full time students living in on or off campus dormitories, the narrower the socio-economic base it is drawing from.
So this is why I started with Elliot Rodger, a guy who found the situation intolerable and just lost it.
We hear more about school shootings at high schools.
www.amazon.com/Rampage-Social-Roots-School-Shootings-ebook/dp/B001JEGOBA/ref=dp_kinw_strp_1
What this author does a very good job of explaining is that school shootings don't occur in inner city ethnic neighborhoods where you do have high crime rates, and where there often are lots of guns in schools. Rather, they happen in these exurban whitetopia monocultures, where the pressure just gets to be unbearable and some people just lose it. Say like in Columbine Colorado.
In a multi racial and economically diverse school, there are social niches which people will find, but not so in a monoculture.
Now are colleges the same way? We do also have more and more of these sorts of shootings at colleges.
So you can say whatever you want about Elliot Rodger, but clearly he was long suffering. I say that for everyone who does something as extreme and destructive as what he did, there are thousands more suffering just as much.
So maybe colleges and universities just suck. I think most people already know that high schools are a serious malady.
So what is the alternative? Well it would have to be some sort of smaller alternative schools, or just some kind of supervised independent study.
Right after Elliot Rodger, I told someone who was a councilor at a state college about Karen Neuman's book and about how those in more varied and open environments can do better. For a college it would be one with more part time and older students, and more students with less privileged back grounds.
I mean, you listen to Elliot Rodger, he is a guy living in a glorified high school social environment. Sure, what he did was wrong, and he did lots of things to make the situation worse for himself. But we still should see that such schools are a negative environment.
So as I see it, the objective of all schooling should be to teach you to educate yourself. 4 years for a degree, maybe another 4 for a doctorate, that still cannot teach you all you need to know. Education needs to be life long, and it needs to be self directed, and I say that this should start as early ass possible and be supported life long.
SJG
But their are also social issues. The more prestigious the school is, and the more it is full time students living in on or off campus dormitories, the narrower the socio-economic base it is drawing from.
So this is why I started with Elliot Rodger, a guy who found the situation intolerable and just lost it.
We hear more about school shootings at high schools.
www.amazon.com/Rampage-Social-Roots-School-Shootings-ebook/dp/B001JEGOBA/ref=dp_kinw_strp_1
What this author does a very good job of explaining is that school shootings don't occur in inner city ethnic neighborhoods where you do have high crime rates, and where there often are lots of guns in schools. Rather, they happen in these exurban whitetopia monocultures, where the pressure just gets to be unbearable and some people just lose it. Say like in Columbine Colorado.
In a multi racial and economically diverse school, there are social niches which people will find, but not so in a monoculture.
Now are colleges the same way? We do also have more and more of these sorts of shootings at colleges.
So you can say whatever you want about Elliot Rodger, but clearly he was long suffering. I say that for everyone who does something as extreme and destructive as what he did, there are thousands more suffering just as much.
So maybe colleges and universities just suck. I think most people already know that high schools are a serious malady.
So what is the alternative? Well it would have to be some sort of smaller alternative schools, or just some kind of supervised independent study.
Right after Elliot Rodger, I told someone who was a councilor at a state college about Karen Neuman's book and about how those in more varied and open environments can do better. For a college it would be one with more part time and older students, and more students with less privileged back grounds.
I mean, you listen to Elliot Rodger, he is a guy living in a glorified high school social environment. Sure, what he did was wrong, and he did lots of things to make the situation worse for himself. But we still should see that such schools are a negative environment.
So as I see it, the objective of all schooling should be to teach you to educate yourself. 4 years for a degree, maybe another 4 for a doctorate, that still cannot teach you all you need to know. Education needs to be life long, and it needs to be self directed, and I say that this should start as early ass possible and be supported life long.
SJG